B&W 800 D3 vs KEF Blade. Let's discuss. (2024)

bandit

Member

Forum Donor

Joined
Dec 29, 2020
Messages
37
Likes
32
Location
Italy
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #1

Hi guys, this is my second post on this forum, I know you're more science oriented so I apologise for posting something more shallow. I am by no means being lazy but I cannot read a measurements graph and I am therefore asking for your help to decide which, in your opinion, are the better speakers between the two I have mentioned.
I have read a very positive review on the KEF R3, posted by Amir. This does not imply that their higher models are equally well performing but it shed some light on a brand which I had previously not considered. I am planning on buying my lifetime speakers (we all know this is never the case) and I am really undecided between the 800 D3 and the Blades, does anyone feel like helping me out? I have not seen much love for B&W on this forum, which I previously considered to be among the best speaker brands on the market, can anyone elaborate on why this isn't the case? Thank you in advance everyone!

Attachments

  • b8f8258e33b079bdd5ff9b6d953b58b3.jpg

    78.2 KB· Views: 1,812

  • 996902cb64867b09bc8a74d1be18e87b.jpg

    59.2 KB· Views: 1,457

tuga

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 5, 2020
Messages
3,984
Likes
4,296
Location
Oxford, England
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #2

The 800D3 doesn't produce a flat frequency response but will perform just as well or maybe better than the Blade in most other parameters.
Ultimately the differences will be mostly down to tonal balance and soundstage/envelopment.

Personally I would never buy speakers this expensive, let alone make a lifetime purchase, without listening. Most people will tell you to get the Kefs but there is still a fair chance that you might prefer the B&Ws. Most symphony hall and classical music label control rooms use 8-series B&Ws, they can't be that bad...

Ilkless

Major Contributor

Forum Donor

Joined
Jan 26, 2019
Messages
1,812
Likes
3,619
Location
Singapore
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #3

800D3 is a thoroughly primitive design next to the Blade. Unfortunately audiophiles outside ASR are largely ignorant of the engineering and care only about the stories and myths built up over time.

OP

bandit

Member

Forum Donor

Joined
Dec 29, 2020
Messages
37
Likes
32
Location
Italy
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • Thread Starter
  • #4

tuga said:

The 800D3 doesn't produce a flat frequency response but will perform just as well or maybe better than the Blade in most other parameters.
Ultimately the differences will be mostly down to tonal balance and soundstage/envelopment.

Personally I would never buy speakers this expensive, let alone make a lifetime purchase, without listening. Most people will tell you to get the Kefs but there is still a fair chance that you might prefer the B&Ws. Most symphony hall and classical music label control rooms use 8-series B&Ws, they can't be that bad...

thank you for your comment! Just like the benchmark ahb2, which I've heard of on this forum, are you aware of any underdog speakers which would significantly outperform the ones I've mentioned? You said you would never spend this much on speakers; Is it solely due to the budget or because they can be outperformed for less money?

OP

bandit

Member

Forum Donor

Joined
Dec 29, 2020
Messages
37
Likes
32
Location
Italy
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • Thread Starter
  • #5

800D3 is a thoroughly primitive design next to the Blade. Unfortunately audiophiles outside ASR are largely ignorant of the engineering and care only about the stories and myths built up over time.

I fall right into the category of the ignorant audiophiles B&W 800 D3 vs KEF Blade. Let's discuss. (8) Are you suggesting that their design translates into poor performance? If so, could you kindly mention how? Thanks

q3cpma

Major Contributor
Joined
May 22, 2019
Messages
3,060
Likes
4,434
Location
France
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #6

bandit said:

underdog speakers which would significantly outperform the ones I've mentioned?

Constantly mentioned on this forum: Kii three (+ BXT), D&D 8c, Genelec 8351B/8361A (+ W371A), GGNTKT's upcoming M2. And that's only because you mentioned the Blade, which I'd like to see measurements of, otherwise the B&W is also bested by more traditional designs like Neumann's KH420.

OP

bandit

Member

Forum Donor

Joined
Dec 29, 2020
Messages
37
Likes
32
Location
Italy
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • Thread Starter
  • #8

q3cpma said:

Constantly mentioned on this forum: Kii three (+ BXT), D&D 8c, Genelec 8351B/8361A (+ W371A), GGNTKT's upcoming M2. And that's only because you mentioned the Blade, which I'd like to see measurements of, otherwise the B&W is also bested by more traditional designs like Neumann's KH420.

I am new to the forum and hadn't noticed most of the speakers you have mentioned apart from the Genelecs, thank you for bringing those up. It's a dumb question but I'm gonna ask it anyway: if active monitors outperform traditional hi-fi systems with passive speakers, regardless of how expensive they are, wouldn't it be the most logical decision to get rid of all the components and just settle for active speakers? If that's the case, are people pretending not to see the truth to keep enjoying their hobby or there are downsides to active speakers that you haven't mentioned?

q3cpma

Major Contributor
Joined
May 22, 2019
Messages
3,060
Likes
4,434
Location
France
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #10

bandit said:

I am new to the forum and hadn't noticed most of the speakers you have mentioned apart from the Genelecs, thank you for bringing those up. It's a dumb question but I'm gonna ask it anyway: if active monitors outperform traditional hi-fi systems with passive speakers, regardless of how expensive they are, wouldn't it be the most logical decision to get rid of all the components and just settle for active speakers? If that's the case, are people pretending not to see the truth to keep enjoying their hobby or there are downsides to active speakers that you haven't mentioned?

You basically get it, as far as objective performance goes. The only downside of active speakers is that reliability becomes a major concern, as electronics failing inside mean a dead speaker; which is why Genelec is also quite trusted even if not as next-gen as D&D or Kii.

Matias

Master Contributor

Forum Donor

Joined
Jan 1, 2019
Messages
5,208
Likes
11,348
Location
São Paulo, Brazil
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #11

q3cpma said:

Guess I forgot to add "more". Something at least as detailed as S&R or ASR; but if we just look at stereophile, the horizontal dispersion is strange.

Agreed.. For such a high tech speaker the normalized horizontal dispersion, specially in the upper bad area, is a key down. But still better than the alternative here.

Pearljam5000

Master Contributor
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
5,434
Likes
5,683
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #12

bandit said:

I am new to the forum and hadn't noticed most of the speakers you have mentioned apart from the Genelecs, thank you for bringing those up. It's a dumb question but I'm gonna ask it anyway: if active monitors outperform traditional hi-fi systems with passive speakers, regardless of how expensive they are, wouldn't it be the most logical decision to get rid of all the components and just settle for active speakers? If that's the case, are people pretending not to see the truth to keep enjoying their hobby or there are downsides to active speakers that you haven't mentioned?

https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...ds/why-do-passive-speakers-still-exist.17729/

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,424
Location
Seattle Area, USA
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #13

tuga said:

Ultimately the differences will be mostly down to tonal balance

+1

B&W has a distinct house sound that falls outside the Harman preference curve.

(which, even in Harman's own research, not all test subjects prefer the consensus curve)

Some people like this sound and B&W has built their brand around that.

B&W sounds so different from KEF that I wouldn't consider them substitutable goods.

You either like their house sound, or you don't.

Chromatischism

Major Contributor

Forum Donor

Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
4,934
Likes
3,854
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #14

I would buy neither and instead get a pair of good towers + 2 subs placed ideally in the room, delayed and equalized properly.

If it's a small room that doesn't have high SPL requirements, standmount speakers can be just as good.

tuga

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 5, 2020
Messages
3,984
Likes
4,296
Location
Oxford, England
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #15

bandit said:

thank you for your comment! Just like the benchmark ahb2, which I've heard of on this forum, are you aware of any underdog speakers which would significantly outperform the ones I've mentioned? You said you would never spend this much on speakers; Is it solely due to the budget or because they can be outperformed for less money?

Not that I could afford speakers at that price, but I said that

I would never spend that much money without listening

because it's through listening that one can determine whether one likes a speaker.
I use measurements for shortlsting but the final arbitrer is the ear.

Last edited:

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,424
Location
Seattle Area, USA
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #16

tuga said:

I use measurements for shortlsting but the final arbitrer is the ear.

And the eye.

Pearljam5000

Master Contributor
Joined
Oct 12, 2020
Messages
5,434
Likes
5,683
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #17

How about Focal?

B&W 800 D3 vs KEF Blade. Let's discuss. (21)

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,424
Location
Seattle Area, USA
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #18

Pearljam5000 said:

How about Focal?
View attachment 102420

Cosmetically, I prefer the Focal Utopias to either B&W or KEF Blade.

Although I wouldn't get blue.

watchnerd

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 8, 2016
Messages
12,449
Likes
10,424
Location
Seattle Area, USA
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • #19

Chromatischism said:

I would buy neither and instead get a pair of good towers + 2 subs placed ideally in the room, delayed and equalized properly.

If it's a small room that doesn't have high SPL requirements, standmount speakers can be just as good.

My room isn't that small, but this is the route I've chosen. Dual subs + stand mounts, high-passing the mains.

OP

bandit

Member

Forum Donor

Joined
Dec 29, 2020
Messages
37
Likes
32
Location
Italy
  • Dec 30, 2020
  • Thread Starter
  • #20

Pearljam5000 said:

How about Focal?
View attachment 102420

That would be an alternative, I am currently reading the thread on active speakers which you have recommended and I'm currently reconsidering my whole life. Thanks though lol

You must log in or register to reply here.

B&W 800 D3 vs KEF Blade. Let's discuss. (2024)
Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Gregorio Kreiger

Last Updated:

Views: 5750

Rating: 4.7 / 5 (77 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Gregorio Kreiger

Birthday: 1994-12-18

Address: 89212 Tracey Ramp, Sunside, MT 08453-0951

Phone: +9014805370218

Job: Customer Designer

Hobby: Mountain biking, Orienteering, Hiking, Sewing, Backpacking, Mushroom hunting, Backpacking

Introduction: My name is Gregorio Kreiger, I am a tender, brainy, enthusiastic, combative, agreeable, gentle, gentle person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.